Fertilizer K-12 Experiments
Fertilizers
spreading manure, an organic fertilizer
Fertilizers (British English, also fertilisers) are compounds given to plants to promote growth; they are usually applied either via the soil, for uptake by plant roots, or by foliar feeding, for uptake through leaves. Fertilizers can be organic (composed of organic matter, i.e. carbon based), or inorganic (containing simple, inorganic chemicals). They can be naturally-occurring compounds such as peat or mineral deposits, or manufactured through natural processes (such as composting) or chemical processes (such as the Haber process).
Fertilizers typically provide, in varying proportions, the three major plant nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium), the secondary plant nutrients (calcium, sulfur, magnesium), and sometimes trace elements (or micronutrients) with a role in plant nutrition: boron, chlorine, manganese, iron, zinc, copper and molybdenum.
Inorganic fertilizers (Mineral Fertilizer)
Macronutrients and micronutrients
FERTILIZERS can be divided into macronutrients or micronutrients
based on their concentations in plant dry matter. There are six
macronutrients: nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, often termed
'primary macronutrients' because their availability is often managed
with NPK fertilizers, and the 'secondary macronutrient', and calcium,
magnesium, and sulfur, which are required in similar quantities but
whose availability is often managed as part of liming and manuring
practices rather than fertilizers. The macronutrients are consumed in
larger quantities and normally present as whole number or tenths of
percentages in plant tissues. There are many micronutrients, and their
importance and occurrence differ somewhat from plant to plant. In
general, most present from 5 to 100 parts per million (ppm) by mass.
Examples of micronutrients are as follows: iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), boron (B), copper (Cu), molybdenum (Mo), and zinc (Zn).
Macronutrient fertilizers
Synthesized materials are also called artificial , and may be described as straight, where the product predominantly contains the three primary ingredients of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), which are known as N-P-K fertilizers or compound fertilizers
when elements are mixed intentionally. They are named or labeled
according to the content of these three elements, which are
macronutrients. The mass fraction (percent) nitrogen is reported
directly. However, phosphorus is reported as diphosphorus pentoxide (P2O5), the anhydride of phosphoric acid, and potassium is reported as potash or potassium oxide (K2O), which is the anhydride of potassium hydroxide.
Fertilizer composition is expressed in this fashion for historical
reasons in the way it was analyzed (conversion to ash for P and K);
this practice dates back to Justus von Liebig (see more below). Consequently, an 18-51-20 fertilizer would have 18% nitrogen as N, 51% phosphorus as P2O5, and 20% potassium as K2O, The other 11%is known as ballast
and has no value to the plants.Although analyses are no longer carried
out by ashing first, the naming convention remains. If nitrogen is the
main element, they are often described as nitrogen fertilizers.
In general, the mass fraction (percentage) of elemental phosphorus, [P] = 0.436 x [P2O5]
and the mass fraction (percentage) of elemental potassium, [K] = 0.83 x [K2O]
(These conversion factors are mandatory under the UK
fertiliser-labelling regulations if elemental values are declared in
addition to the N-P-K declaration.[1])
An 18−51−20 fertiliser therefore contains, by weight, 18% elemental
nitrogen (N), 22% elemental phosphorus (P) and 16% elemental potassium
(K).
Agricultural versus Horticultural Fertilizers
In general, agricultural fertilizers contain only one or two
macronutrients. Agricultural fertilizers are intended to be applied
infrequently and normally prior to or along side seeding. Examples of
agricultural fertilizers are granular triple superphosphate, potassium chloride, urea, and anhydrous ammonia.
The commodity nature of fertilizer, combined with the high cost of
shipping, leads to use of locally available materials or those from the
closest/cheapest source, which may vary with factors affecting
transportation by rail, ship, or truck. In other words, a particular nitrogen
source may be very popular in one part of the country while another is
very popular in another geographic region only due to factors unrelated
to agronomic concerns.
Horticultural or specialty fertilizers, on the other hand, are
formulated from many of the same compounds and some others to produce
well-balanced fertilizers that also contain micronutrients. Some
materials, such as ammonium nitrate,
are used minimally in large scale production farming. The 18-51-20
example above is a horticultural fertilizer formulated with high
phosphorus to promote bloom development in ornamental flowers.
Horticultural fertilizers may be water-soluble (instant release) or
relatively insoluble (controlled release). Controlled release
fertilizers are also referred to as sustained release or timed release.
Many controlled release fertilizers are intended to be applied
approximately every 3-6 months, depending on watering, growth rates,
and other conditions, whereas water-soluble fertilizers must be applied
at least every 1-2 weeks and can be applied as often as every watering
if sufficiently dilute. Unlike agricultural fertilizers, horticultural
fertilizers are marketed directly to consumers and become part of
retail product distribution lines.
Justus von Liebig
Chemist Justus von Liebig
(in the 19th century) contributed greatly to understanding the role of
inorganic compounds in plant nutrition and devised the concept of Liebig's barrel
to illustrate the significance of inadequate concentrations of
essential nutrients. At the same time he deemphasized the role of humus. This theory was influential in the great expansion in use of artificial fertilizers in the 20th century.
Nitrogen fertilizer is often synthesized using the Haber-Bosch process, which produces ammonia. This ammonia is applied directly to the soil or used to produce other compounds, notably ammonium nitrate, a dry, concentrated product. It can also be used in the Odda Process to produce compound fertilizers such as 15-15-15.
Inorganic fertilizers sometimes do not replace trace mineral
elements in the soil which become gradually depleted by crops grown
there. This has been linked to studies which have shown a marked fall
(up to 75%) in the quantities of such minerals present in fruit and
vegetables.[2] One exception to this is in Western Australia where deficiencies of zinc, copper, manganese, iron and molybdenum
were identified as limiting the growth of crops and pastures in the
1940's and 1950's. Soils in Western Australia are very old, highly
weathered and deficient in many of the major nutrients and trace
elements. Since this time these trace elements are routinely added to
inorganic fertilizers used in Agriculture in this state.
In many countries there is the public perception that inorganic
fertilizers "poison the soil" and result in "low quality" produce.
However, there is very little (if any) scientific evidence to support
these views. When used appropriately, inorganic fertilizers enhance
plant growth, the accumulation of organic matter and the biological
activity of the soil, while reducing the risk of water run-off,
overgrazing and soil erosion. The nutritional value of plants for human
and animal consumption is typically improved when inorganic fertilizers
are used appropriately.
Organic fertilizers
- Examples of naturally occurring organic fertilizers include manure, slurry, worm castings, peat, seaweed and guano. Green manure crops are also grown to add nutrients to the soil.
Naturally occurring minerals such as mine rock phosphate, sulfate of
potash and limestone are also considered Organic Fertilizers.
- Examples of manufactured organic fertilizers include compost, bloodmeal, bone meal and seaweed extracts. Other examples are natural enzyme digested proteins, fish meal, and feather meal.
The decomposing crop residue
from prior years is another source of fertility. Though not strictly
considered "fertilizer", the distinction seems more a matter of words
than reality.
Some ambiguity in the usage of the term 'organic' exists because some of synthetic fertilizers, such as urea and urea formaldehyde, are fully organic in the sense of organic chemistry.
In fact, it would be difficult to chemically distinguish between urea
of biological origin and that produced synthetically. On the other
hand, some fertilizer materials commonly approved for organic
agriculture, such as powdered limestone, mined "rock phosphate" and Chilean saltpeter, are inorganic in the use of the term by chemistry.
Although the density of nutrients in organic material is
comparatively modest, they have some advantages. For one thing organic
growers typically produce some or all of their fertilizer on-site, thus
lowering operating costs considerably. Then there is the matter of how
effective they are at promoting plant growth, chemical soil test
results aside. The answers are encouraging. Since the majority of
nitrogen supplying organic fertilizers contain insoluble nitrogen and
are slow release fertilizers their effectiveness can be greater than
conventional nitrogen fertilzers.
Implicit in modern theories of organic agriculture is the idea that
the pendulum has swung the other way to some extent in thinking about
plant nutrition. While admitting the obvious success of Leibig's
theory, they stress that there are serious limitations to the current
methods of implementing it via chemical fertilization. They
re-emphasize the role of humus and other organic components of soil,
which are believed to play several important roles:
- Mobilizing existing soil nutrients, so that good growth is achieved with lower nutrient densities while wasting less
- Releasing nutrients at a slower, more consistent rate, helping to avoid a boom-and-bust pattern
- Helping to retain soil moisture, reducing the stress due to temporary moisture stress
- Improving the soil structure
Organics also have the advantage of avoiding certain long-term
problems associated with the regular heavy use of artificial
fertilizers:
- the possibility of "burning" plants with the concentrated chemicals (i.e. an over supply of some nutrients)
- the progressive decrease of real or perceived "soil health",
apparent in loss of structure, reduced ability to absorb precipitation,
lightening of soil color, etc.
- the necessity of reapplying artificial fertilizers regularly (and perhaps in increasing quantities) to maintain fertility
- the cost (substantial and rising in recent years) and resulting lack of independence
Organic fertilizers also have their disadvantages:
- As acknowledged above, they are typically a dilute source of
nutrients compared to inorganic fertilizers, and where significant
amounts of nutrients are required for profitable yields, very large
amounts of organic fertilizers must be applied. This results in
prohibitive transportation and application costs, especially where the
agriculture is practiced a long distance from the source of the organic
fertilizer.
- The composition of organic fertilizers tends to be highly variable,
so that accurate application of nutrients to match plant production is
difficult. Hence, large-scale agriculture tends to rely on inorganic
fertilizers while organic fertilizers are cost-effective on small-scale
horticultural or domestic gardens.
In practice a compromise between the use of artificial and organic
fertilizers is common, typically by using inorganic fertilizers
supplemented with the application of organics that are readily
available such as the return of crop residues or the application of
manure.
It is important to differentiate between what we mean by organic fertilizers and fertilizers approved for use in organic farming and organic gardening by organizations and authorities who provide organic certification services. Some approved fertilizers may be inorganic, naturally occurring chemical compounds, e.g. minerals...
Environmental effects of fertilizer use
Over-application of chemical fertilizers, or application of chemical
fertilizers at a time when the ground is waterlogged or the crop is not
able to use the chemicals, can lead to surface runoff (particularly phosphorus) or leaching into groundwater (particularly nitrates). One of the adverse effects of excess fertilizer in lacustrine systems are algal blooms,
which can lead to excessive mortality rates for fish and other aquatic
organisms. When prolonged algae blooms occur over many years, the
effect is a process called eutrophication. Worldwide the issues of nutrient fate are analyzed using hydrology transport models.
Excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications can lead to pest problems
by increasing the birth rate, longevity and overall fitness of certain
pests (Jahn 2004; Jahn et al. 2001a,b, 2005; Preap et al. 2002, 2001).
It is also possible to over-apply organic fertilizers. However:
their nutrient content, their solubility, and their release rates are
typically much lower than chemical fertilizers, partially because by
their nature, most organic fertilizers also provide increased physical
and biological storage mechanisms to soils.
The problem of over-fertilization is primarily associated with the
use of artificial fertilizers, because of the massive quantities
applied and the destructive nature of chemical fertilizers on soil
nutrient holding structures. The high solubilities of chemical
fertilizers also exacerbate their tendency to degrade ecosystems.
Storage and application of some fertilizers in some weather or soil conditions can cause emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). Ammonia gas (NH3)
may be emitted following application of inorganic fertilizers, or
manure or slurry. Besides supplying nitrogen, ammonia can also increase
soil acidity (lower pH, or "souring").
For these reasons, it is recommended that knowledge of the nutrient
content of the soil and nutrient requirements of the crop are carefully
balanced with application of nutrients in inorganic fertiliser
especially. This process is called nutrient budgeting.
By careful monitoring of soil conditions, farmers can avoid wasting
expensive fertilizers, and also avoid the potential costs of cleaning
up any pollution created as a byproduct of their farming.
The concentration of up to 100 mg/kg of Cadmium in phosphate minerals (for example Nauru[3] and the Christmas islands [4]) increases the contamination of soil with Cadmium, for example in New Zealand.[5] Uranium is another example for impurities of fertilizers
References
- ^ UK Fertilisers Regulations 1990, Schedule 2 Part 1, Para. 7.
- ^ Lawrence, Felicity (2004). “214”, Kate Barker: Not on the Label. Penguin, 213. ISBN 0-14-101566-7.
- ^ Syers
JK, Mackay AD, Brown MW, Currie CD (1986). "Chemical and physical
characteristics of phosphate rock materials of varying reactivity". J Sci Food Agric 37: 1057-1064.
- ^ Trueman NA (1965). "The phosphate, volcanic and carbonate rocks of Christmas Island (Indian Ocean)". J Geol Soc Aust 12: 261-286.
- ^ Taylor MD (1997). "Accumulation of Cadmium derived from fertilisers in New Zealand soils". Science of Total Environment 208: 123-126.
- Jahn, GC (2004.). "Effect of soil
nutrients on the growth, survival and fecundity of insect pests of
rice: an overview and a theory of pest outbreaks with consideration of
research approaches. Multitrophic interactions in Soil and Integrated
Control.". International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) wprs Bulletin 27 (1):: 115-122.
- Jahn GC, Sanchez ER, Cox PG
(2001.). "The Quest for Connections: Developing a research agenda for
integrated pest and nutrient management.". IRRI Discussion Paper No. 42, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños (Philippines): 18.
- Jahn, GC, P.G. Cox., E.
Rubia-Sanchez, and M. Cohen (2001.). "The quest for connections:
developing a research agenda for integrated pest and nutrient
management. pp. 413-430,". S. Peng and B. Hardy [eds.] “Rice
Research for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation.” Proceeding the
International Rice Research Conference, 31 March – 3 April 2000, Los
Baños, Philippines. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice
Research Institute.: 692.
- Jahn, GC, LP Almazan, and J Pacia. (2005.). "Effect
of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of the rusty
plum aphid, Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on
rice (Oryza sativa L.).". Environmental Entomology 34 (4):: 938-943.
- Preap, V., M. P. Zalucki, H. J.
Nesbitt, and G. C. Jahn (2001.). "Effect of fertilizer, pesticide
treatment, and plant variety on realized fecundity and survival rates
of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål); Generating Outbreaks in Cambodia.". Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology 4 (1):: 75-84.
- Preap, V., MP Zalucki, GC Jahn
(2002.). "Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and host plant variety on
fecundity and early instar survival of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål):
immediate response.". Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop
on Inter-Country Forecasting System and Management for Planthopper in
East Asia. November 13-15, 2002. Guilin China. Published by Rural
Development Administration (RDA) and the Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO). 2002. Pp: 163-180, 226.
See also
External links
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Fertilizer"
|