Fuel Economy Experiments
Fuel Economy
A low-energy vehicle is any type of vehicle that uses less energy
than a regular vehicle. The higher efficiency can be achieved by
changing the vehicle's design, not only powertrain modifications. The
biggest influence on the efficiency however is not the engineering
quality but the vehicle specification such as top speed, safety
reserves and load capacity.
Motivation
If we reduce energy demand, we reduce access conflicts to oil
reserves and/or environmental damage when trying to produce fuel from
natural or other fossil sources. Existing published consumption figures
tend to underestimate the consumption seen in practice by 20 to 30% (Fuel economy in automobiles). The reason is that auto makers use every
available trick to produce low looking fuel consumption figures to
counter the motivation to abandon existing vehicle concepts. The
promoters of LEnVs often exaggerate the likely range and performance
envelope of their vehicles for much the same reason - marketing. Even
the most fuel efficient two seater on the market - the Smart MHD consumes two times more energy per km
than a cabin based ultralight two seater would. Pilot vehicles have
proven that a feasible target may lie in the range of 1-2 l/100km, or
lower, or 10 kWh/100 km electricity, for vehicles that do not meet
current requirements for range, crashworthiness, passenger comfort or
speed.
Available electric LEVs already use about ten times less energy than available cars, e.g. 4–8 kW·h/100 km (from 230 V AC grid) for the Twike.[1] Here the challenges are increasing range and lifetime of batteries, crashworthiness, passenger comfort, and reducing the price.
Energy Efficiency in MJ per km: It is prefered to express
energy efficiency in MJ (Mega-Joule) per km because terms like MPG
(Miles Per Gallon) and Liters per km do not take into account what type
of fuel is used and thus the numbers will be distorted for different
fuel types. Diesel contains 38.7MJ per liter, Gasoline 34.6MJ per liter
and Bio-Diesel 30.5MJ per liter, whereas LPG contains only 22.2MJ per
liter which is why you will see the number of liters consumed go up
drastically when coverting a gasoline car to LPG. This does not mean
that the energy consumption goes up; it only means that there is less
energy in a liter of LPG. Ethanol also contains much less energy per
liter than gasoline.
Preconditions
Energy demand may be kept low by:
- lower parasitic masses (compared to the average load) causing low
energy demand in transitional operation (stop and go operation in the
cities)
where P stands for power, mvehicle for the total vehicle mass, a for the vehicles acceleration and v
for the vehicles velocity. Extreme masses will go down to 300 kg from
today's 1100 kg to 1600 kg. Five seaters of the sixties had 625 kg.[2] Japanese sub-compact cars have 500-600 kg. Further mass reduction is possible by lowering the maximum number of passengers. Two-seater microcars have less than 400 kg, single-seaters less than 300 kg. Further reductions are possible with very light construction, e.g. Twike. Such vehicles offer less passive safety but higher safety for other road users and higher overall safety at lower speed levels.
- low cross-sectional area and mirrors replaced by cameras causing very low drag losses especially when driven at higher speed
where F stands for the force, Across for the cross-sectional area of the vehicle, ρair for the density of the air and vair
for the relative velocity of the air (incl. wind). Two seating places
in a tandem (back to back or forward facing in line) arrangement
drastically reduce the cross-sectional area down to 1 m². The drag coefficient Cd of the vehicle may be as low as 0.15 for very good vehicles.
- low rolling resistance due to smaller and high pressure tires with optimised tread and low vehicle mass driving the rolling resistance
where μroll stands for the rolling resistance coefficient, g for acceleration due to gravity and mvehicle for the vehicle mass. Advanced driver assistance and ABS prevent safety problems caused by the small tires. Values of μroll down to 0.0025 are possible but are more usually 0.005 to 0.008 for cycle-type tires and 0.010 to 0.015 for car tires.
Technological support for low energy operation may also come from
driver assistance systems since driving style can be adapted to achieve
lower energy consumption. Energy management becomes possible with hybrid vehicles with the possibility to recuperate braking energy and to operate the internal combustion engine
(ICE) at higher efficiency on average. Hybrid power trains may also
reduce the ICE-engine size thus increasing the average load factor and
minimising the part load losses. Purely electric vehicles use up to 10
x less energy (0,3 to 0,5MJ/km)than those with combustion engines (3 to
5MJ/km and up to 10MJ/km for SUVs) because of the much higher motor and
battery efficiencies. However, maximum ranges are much less because of
the low energy density of electrochemical storage batteries compared to
chemical fuels.
Facts
Some newer examples of efficient commercially available internal combustion-propelled vehicles:
- Audi A2 (3l) 1.16 MJ/km (3.0 l Diesel/100 km / 94 mpg UK / 78 mpg US) (removed from production)
- VW Lupo (3l) 1.16 MJ/km (3.0 l Diesel/100km / 94 mpg UK / 78 mpg US) (removed from production)
- Toyota Prius 1.45 MJ/km (Hybrid) (4.2 l/100 km / 67 mpg UK / 56 mpg US)
- Honda Insight 1.49 MJ/km Hybrid vehicle (4.3 l/100 km / 65 mpg UK / 54 mpg US) (removed from production)
- Honda Civic Hybrid 1.59 MJ/km (4.6 l/100 km / 55 mpg UK / 46 mpg US)
- Citroen C3 1.94 MJ/km Stop & Start (5.0 l Diesel/100 km / 56 mpg UK / 47 mpg US)
Average data for vehicle types sold in the U.S.A.[3] compared to an advanced vehicle concept, the Honda Insight:
| Type |
Width |
Height |
Curb weight |
Combined fuel economy |
| Minivans |
75.9 in 193 cm |
70.2 in 178 cm |
4275 lb 1939 kg |
20.36 mpg 11.55 l/100 km |
| Family sedans |
70.3 in 179 cm |
57.3 in 146 cm |
3144 lb 1426 kg |
26.94 mpg 8.73 l/100 km |
| SUVs |
73.5 in 187 cm |
70.7 in 180 cm |
4242 lb 1924 kg |
19.19 mpg 12.25 l/100 km |
| Honda Insight[4] |
66.7 in 169 cm |
53.3 in 135 cm |
1850 lb 839 kg |
63 mpg 3.73 l/100 km |
Drag resistance for SUVs is at least (same drag coefficient) 30%
higher and the acceleration force has to be 35% bigger compared to
family sedans. This gives of 40% higher fuel consumptions (even when
including parallel hybrid electric SUVs).
Reality
In practice we have not seen much on the market focusing on low
propulsion energy demand. The last good examples were the GM EV-1 and
the Honda Insight. There are however several relevant scientific
competitions such as the Shell Eco-Marathon, Automotive X Prize and Solar car racing.
In the near future several low energy vehicles may be in production, including the Aptera Motors Typ-1 with three wheels and a claimed Cd of 0.11, due in late 2008, and the Loremo.
Triggered by congestion charging in London and other environmental incentives in Europe a few Battery electric vehicles have arrived on the market, such REVA G-Wiz and the MEGA City NICE.
Measures
The EU- sponsored RECODRIVE project[5]
has set up a quality circle to manage low energy consumption in fleets.
This starts with energy aware procurement, and includes fuel
management, driver information and training and incentives for all
staff involved in the fleet management and maintenance process. Vehicle
equipped with gear shift indicators, tire pressure monitoring systems
and downsized internal combustion engines and for stop'n go operation
also hybrid electric power trains will help to save fuel.
Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors
Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors describe techniques that drivers can use to optimize their automobile fuel economy. The energy in fuel consumed in driving is lost in many ways, including engine inefficiency, aerodynamic drag, rolling friction, potential energy required to climb hills, and kinetic energy lost to braking (absent regenerative braking).
Driver behavior can influence all of these. The city mileage of
conventional cars is much lower than highway mileage due to: 1) a high
proportion of idling time, 2) operation mostly at very inefficient
low-output engine operating points, and 3) more frequent braking.
Terminology
Various terms describe drivers using unusual driving techniques to maximize fuel efficiency. A few of these are:
- Hypermilers are drivers who exceed the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimated fuel efficiency on their vehicles by modifying their driving habits. The term 'hypermiler' originated from hybrid vehicle driving clubs and Wayne Gerdes in particular.[1] As people began comparing fuel efficiency,
they noticed that by using certain driving techniques, they could
greatly improve their mileage. With the aid of real time mileage
displays, drivers were able to refine these driving techniques and
greatly exceed the EPA rating for their vehicle. Decades before the
word 'hypermiler' was used, the techniques were used in events such as Mobil Economy Run dating to 1936. [2] Gas rationing during World War II
forced some drivers to adopt these techniques, but they largely fell
out of favor with the population after the war. Hypermiler Wayne Gerdes
can get 59 MPG in a Honda Accord and 30 MPG in an Acura MDX.[3]
- Nempimania (also Nenpimania) is an obsession with getting the best fuel economy possible from a hybrid car. It is derived from the Japanese "nempi" (燃費)--a contraction of nenryōshōhiryō (燃料消費量)[4] meaning fuel economy, and "mania". Nempimania is exhibited by owners of the Toyota Prius and other hybrid owners by various habits aimed at maximizing fuel economy: slow starts, "Pulse and Glide", timing stoplights, driving barefoot, etc.
- Ecodriving is a term used in Europe to name initiatives
which support energy efficient use of vehicles. The campaigns include
training courses with hands on training - fuel gauges etc.
Techniques used to maximize fuel economy
Techniques used to improve fuel economy include general techniques
that can be applied to most driving, and specialized techniques that
are more narrowly applicable, but can be used to achieve extremely high
mileage.
General techniques
- Maintenance
One of the best ways to optimize mileage (both hybrid and non-hybrid) is to keep up with vehicle maintenance.[1] Key parameters to maintain are tire pressure, tire balance and wheel alignment, and proper motor oil
weight and level. Inflating tires to the maximum recommended air
pressure ensures that less energy is required to move the car.
Under-inflated tires can lower gas mileage by approximately 1.4 percent
for every 1 psi drop in pressure of all four tires per gas tank. [5] Equally important is the proper maintenance of the Engine Control Module and all sensors it relies on to control engine operation such as oxygen sensors.
- Minimizing mass
Beyond purchasing smaller vehicles, drivers can also increase fuel
economy by minimizing the amount of luggage, tools, and equipment
carried in the car, including such things as unneeded snow chains in the summer and outdoor sporting equipment in the winter.
- Speed
Maintaining an efficient speed is also very effective in keeping mileage up.[1]
Optimal efficiency can be expected while cruising with no stops, at
minimal throttle and with the transmission in the highest gear. Every
car has a different optimum speed, although it is usually reported to
be in the range of 35 to 55 mph[6][7] [8].
For instance a 2004 Chevrolet Impala had an optimum at 70 kph, and was
within 15% of that from 45 to 95 kph (roughly 25 to 55 mph)[6].
Drivers of cars with fuel-economy displays can their own cars by
cruising at different speeds (if safe and prudent to do so) and
checking the readout.
- Acceleration (including braking)
Gentle acceleration is often recommended. This is primarily helpful
in avoiding unnecessary acceleration, which might lead to inefficient
high speeds or might lead to a need to brake a short time later. Brakes
are designed to dissipate energy and should be avoided whenever
possible, by anticipating what is happening ahead, not driving so fast,
and slowing down by placing the gear in neutral, or hitting the clutch
(this is illegal in many jurisdictions, and may annoy other road
users). On the US standard highway cycle roughly 2% of the fuel's
energy is wasted in braking, whereas on the urban cycle 6% is lost.[9]
For a given target speed, more rapid acceleration can be more
efficient because the engine is more efficient at larger throttle
openings[10]
However, it is also important to keep the engine RPM in an efficient
range, so rapid acceleration also requires rapid up-shifting. Rapid
up-shifting is possible with a manual transmission, but some automatic
transmissions avoid up-shifting when the throttle is wide open,
negating the efficiency benefits of large throttle openings.
- Fuel choice
It is commonly believed that efficiency of a gasoline engine is
related to the fuel's octane level; however, this is not true in most
situations. Octane rating
is only a measure of the fuel's propensity to cause an engine to
"ping", this ping is due to pre-combustion, pre-combustion is caused by
the fuel burning too rapidly (before the piston reaches top dead
center). Higher octane fuels burn more uniformly at high pressures
(instead of burning nearly instantaneously across the mass, which is
equivalent to "exploding"), thus produce less ping. For the vast
majority of vehicles (i.e. vehicles with "standard" compression
ratios), standard octane fuel will work fine and not cause pinging.
Using high octane fuel in a vehicle that does not need it is simply
wasting money[11], although Toyota have measured slight differences in efficiency due to octane number even when knock is not an issue [12].
Most cars fitted with emissions systems have sensors that will
automatically adjust the timing, when ping is detected, so low octane
fuel can be used even if the engine is designed for high octane, at
some cost in efficiency. If the engine is designed for high octane then
higher octane fuel will result in higher performance (with full-open
throttle), but not necessarily fuel cost savings, since the high-octane
is only needed with the throttle fully open. For other cars that have
problems with ping, it may be due to a maintenance problem, such as
carbon buildup inside the cylinder or incorrect spark plug tip length.
In such cases, higher octane fuel may help, but this is an expensive
fix, proper repair might make more long term sense. There is slightly
less energy in a gallon of high octane fuel, than low octane[13].
Ping is very bad for an engine and if this condition exists, it will
decrease fuel economy and will damage the engine in the long term.
- Trip computer
While modern hybrids come with built-in trip computers which display
real-time MPG, which helps the driver adjust driving habits, most
gasoline powered vehicles do not have this as a standard option
(although some luxury cars do). However, this information is available
with an add-on device that connects to the car's onboard computer (post
1996 for most vehicles), such as the ScanGauge.[14]. This information is helpful in allowing the driver to see in real-time how driving techniques affect gas mileage.[1]
Specialized techniques
These are less broadly applicable, and some may compromise safety.
- Pulse and glide
This method consists of accelerating to a given speed (the "pulse"),
followed by a period of coasting (the "glide"), and then repeating the
process. The glide is most efficient when the engine is not running.
Because some cars inject extra fuel when the starter is activated, this
was originally best accomplished with a manual transmission.[15] Hybrid vehicles, such as the Toyota Prius, are ideally suited to performing this technique as well: the internal combustion engine as well as the charging system can, be shut off for the glide by simply manipulating the accelerator.[16]
- Autostop, forced stop, and draft-assisted forced stop
Some hybrids must keep the engine running whenever the vehicle is in
motion and the transmission engaged, although they still have an
"auto-stop" feature which engages when the vehicle stops, avoiding
waste. Maximizing use of autostop is critical on these vehicles because
idling causes a severe drop in accumulated mileage (0 miles per
gallon). In addition, many hypermilers will actually turn off their
cars entirely (a "forced stop") or put them into neutral when going
down hills or in other situations when momentum will carry the car on
its own.[1]
Draft-assisted forced stop, a variation of the forced (auto)stop
(sometimes abbreviated as D-FAS), involves turning off the engine and
gliding in neutral while tailgating a larger vehicle, in order to take advantage of the reduced wind resistance in its immediate wake
(This practice is illegal in some areas due to its danger); while
tailgating itself is inherently risky, the danger of collision is
increased with D-FAS as power for power brakes can be lost after a few applications of the brake pedal and the pressure that causes power steering to function can be lost as well.[17]
Hybrid and electric engines
-
The most effective commonly available hybrid vehicles in the hypermilage marathons are the Honda Insight Hybrid, the Toyota Prius Hybrid, and the Honda Civic Hybrid. Other hybrids have also done very well. Some historical non-hybrid vehicles such as the Honda Civic CR-X HF and the Smart Fortwo
have also done remarkably well on mileage. The Toyota and Ford hybrids
use two motor generators called a series-parallel hybrid with unique
characteristics different from the single motor generators of the Honda
and GM hybrids (as of January 2007). The Honda motor generator is
integrated with the engine, the Integrated Motor Assist
(IMA) that enhances the low-end torque of the engine. The current GM
hybrids turn-off the engine at a stop and restart it when ready to
leave.
The Toyota and Ford hybrids have a threshold speed—around 42 mph in
the case of the Prius—above which the engine must run to protect the
transmission system. Below this model-dependent speed, the car will
automatically switch between either battery-powered mode or engine
power with battery recharge. These hybrids typically get their best
fuel efficiency below this model dependent threshold speed. Coasting
can be achieved by using Neutral transmission range. The Honda IMA
vehicles have a limited, battery-only, powered capability, although
after-market modding has made the Insight capable of running in
electric only-mode [7]. They achieve higher fuel economy [8]. Another way to save fuel includes turning off the engine on manual transmission vehicles when coasting.
The GM hybrids have an engine auto-stop when halted. As of January
2007, they have no battery-only, powered capability. In late 2007, GM
will introduce two two-mode hybrid, full-size SUVs, which can be
powered by electric motors, V8 engines, or a combination of both.
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e Ten fuel-saving tips from a hypermiler, by Chris Diken and Erica Francis, MSNBC. The term was coined by Wayne Gerdes. "Gerdes isn’t just a hypermiler. He’s the hypermiler. He’s the man who coined the term ‘hypermiler’"
- ^ New York Times article on Mobil Economy Run - BOB KNOLL - December 24, 2006
- ^ Gaffney, Dennis. "This Guy Can Get 59 MPG in a Plain Old Accord. Beat That, Punk.", Mother Jones, 2007-01-01. Retrieved on 2007-04-20.
- ^ Ministry of
Education, Science and Culture, ed. (1979) "Japanese Scientific Terms,
Electrical Engineering Edition" Tokyo: Koronasha. 3054-000010-2353
- ^ http://www.twike.ch
- ^ http://www.homepages.hetnet.nl/~meinsma/english.htm
- ^ http://www.theautochannel.com/
- ^ http://www.insightcentral.net/encyclopedia/index.html InsightCentral], encyclopedia featuring the measures shown for the Honda Insight
- ^ Rewarding and Recognition Schemes for Energy Conserving Driving, Vehicle procurement and maintenance website
- ^ TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD SPECIAL REPORT 286 TIRES AND PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY p46 (Schuring)
- ^ a b [1] Graph of fuel consumption vs speed for an Impala
- ^ [2] Graph of fuel consumption vs. speed for a BMW
- ^ Modeling Light-Duty Vehicle Emissions Based on Instantaneous Speed and Acceleration Levels, [3], kyoungho Ahn, 2002 Virginia Tech PhD Thesis, Fig. 5-7
- ^ TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD SPECIAL REPORT 286 TIRES AND PASSENGER VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY Fig 3-1
- ^ [4] Q: How do you get 116 mpg (US) in a Metro XFi? A: Pulse and glide.
- ^ http://www.faqs.org/faqs/autos/gasoline-faq/part3/preamble.html Section 6.13
- ^ SAE paper 2007012007
- ^ Bosch Automotive Handbook
- ^ ScanGauge
- ^ [5] Q: How do you get 116 mpg (US) in a Metro XFi? A: Pulse and glide.
- ^ [6] How to Pulse and Glide in a Toyota Prius
- ^ Dennis Gaffney. This Guy Can Get 59 MPG in a Plain Old Accord. Beat That, Punk.. Mother Jones, January/February 2007. Retrieved 2007-05-11.
External links
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Fuel Economy"
|