Resonance K-12 Experiments
Resonance
Increase of amplitude as damping decreases and frequency approaches resonance frequency
In physics, resonance
is the phenomenon of producing large amplitude of vibrations by a small
periodic driving force. It is the tendency of a system to oscillate at maximum amplitude at a certain frequency. This frequency is known as the system's resonance frequency (or resonant frequency). When damping is small, the resonance frequency is approximately equal to the natural frequency
of the system, which is the frequency of free vibrations. Under
resonance condition the energy supplied by the driving force is
sufficient enough to overcome friction.
Examples
One familiar example is a playground swing, which is a crude pendulum.
When pushing someone in a swing, pushes that are timed with the correct
interval between them (the resonant frequency), will make the swing go
higher and higher (maximum amplitude), while attempting to push the
swing at a faster or slower rate will result in much smaller arcs.
Resonance occurs in nature, and is exploited in many man-made devices. Some examples:
A resonator, whether mechanical,
acoustic, or electrical, will probably have more than one resonance
frequency (especially harmonics of the strongest resonance). It will be
easy to vibrate at those frequencies, and more difficult to vibrate at
other frequencies. It will "pick out" its resonance frequency from a
complex excitation, such as an impulse or a wideband noise excitation.
In effect, it is filtering out all frequencies other than its resonance.
See also: center frequency
Theory
For a linear oscillator with a resonance frequency Ω, the intensity of oscillations I when the system is driven with a driving frequency ω is given by:

The intensity is defined as the square of the amplitude of the oscillations. This is a Lorentzian function, and this response is found in many physical situations involving resonant systems. Γ is a parameter dependent on the damping of the oscillator, and is known as the linewidth
of the resonance. Heavily damped oscillators tend to have broad
linewidths, and respond to a wider range of driving frequencies around
the resonance frequency. The linewidth is inversely proportional to the Q factor, which is a measure of the sharpness of the resonance.
Old Tacoma Narrows bridge failure
The collapse of the Old Tacoma Narrows Bridge,
nicknamed Galloping Gertie, in 1940 is sometimes characterized in
physics textbooks as a classical example of resonance. This description
is misleading, however. It would be more correct to say that the bridge
failed due to the action of self-excited forces upon it, largely
through a phenomenon known as aeroelastic flutter. Robert H. Scanlan, father of the field of bridge aerodynamics, wrote an article about this misunderstanding[1].
Cause of collapse
The bridge was solidly built, with girders of carbon steel anchored in huge blocks of concrete.
Preceding designs typically had open lattice beam trusses underneath
the roadbed. This bridge was the first of its type to employ plate
girders (pairs of deep I beams)
to support the roadbed. With the earlier designs any wind would simply
pass through the truss, but in the new design the wind would be
diverted above and below the structure. Shortly after construction
finished at the end of June (opened to traffic on July 1, 1940), it was discovered that the bridge would sway and buckle dangerously in relatively mild windy conditions for the area. This resonance was transverse,
meaning the bridge buckled along its length, with the roadbed
alternately raised and depressed in certain locations -- one half of
the central span would rise while the other lowered. Drivers would see
cars approaching from the other direction disappear into valleys which
were dynamically appearing and disappearing. From this behavior, a
local humorist coined the nickname "Galloping Gertie". However, the
mass of the bridge was considered sufficient to keep it structurally
sound.
The failure of the bridge occurred when a never-before-seen twisting
mode occurred, from winds at a mild 40 MPH. This is called a torsional, rather than longitudinal, mode (see also torque)
whereby when the left side of the roadway went down, the right side
would rise, and vice-versa, with the centerline of the road remaining
still. Specifically, it was the second torsional mode, in which
the midpoint of the bridge remained motionless while the two halves of
the bridge twisted in opposite directions. Two men proved this point by
walking along the center line, unaffected by the flapping of the
roadway rising and falling to each side. This vibration was due to aeroelastic flutter. Flutter occurs when a torsional disturbance in the structure increases the angle of attack
of the bridge (that is, the angle between the wind and the bridge). The
structure responds by twisting further. Eventually, the angle of attack
increases to the point of stall,
and the bridge begins to twist in the opposite direction. In the case
of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, this mode was negatively damped (or had positive feedback),
meaning it increased in amplitude with each cycle because the wind
pumped in more energy than the flexing of the structure dissipated.
Eventually, the amplitude of the motion increased beyond the strength
of a vital part, in this case the suspender cables. Once several cables
failed, the weight of the deck transferred to the adjacent cables which
broke in turn until almost all of the central deck fell into the water
below the span.
The bridge's spectacular self-destruction is often used as an object lesson in the necessity to consider both aerodynamics and resonance effects in civil and structural engineering. However the effect that caused the destruction of the bridge should not be confused with forced resonance (as from the periodic motion induced by a group of soldiers marching in step across a bridge).[8] In the case of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, there was no periodic disturbance. The wind was steady at 42 mph (67 km/h). The frequency of the destructive mode, 0.2 Hz, was neither a natural mode of the isolated structure nor the frequency of blunt-body vortex shedding
of the bridge at that wind speed. The event can only be understood
while considering the coupled aerodynamic and structural system which
requires rigorous mathematical analysis to reveal all the degrees of
freedom of the particular structure and the set of design loads imposed.
In 1943, New York City's similarly slim Whitestone Bridge was retrofitted with a 14-foot deep Warren truss and Diagonal stays to reduce deck oscillations. The Warren Truss was removed in 2001 and replaced with hydraulic dampers and deck-edge fairings to maintain stability.
Resonances in quantum mechanics
In quantum mechanics and quantum field theory
resonances may appear in similar circumstances to classical physics.
However, they can also be thought of as unstable particles, with the
formula above still valid if the Γ is the decay rate and Ω replaced by the particle's mass M. In that case, the formula just comes from the particle's propagator, with its mass replaced by the complex number M + iΓ. The formula is further related to the particle's decay rate by the optical theorem.
String resonance in music instruments
-
String resonance occurs on string instruments. Strings or parts of strings may resonate at their fundamental or overtone
frequencies when other strings are sounded. For example, an A string at
440 Hz will cause an E string at 330 Hz to resonate, because they share
an overtone of 1320 Hz (the third overtone of A and fourth overtone of
E).
See also
References
- ^ K. Billah and R. Scanlan (1991), Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure, and Undergraduate Physics Textbooks, American Journal of Physics, 59(2), 118--124 (PDF)
External links
Mechanical Resonance
Mechanical resonance is the tendency of a mechanical system to absorb more energy when the frequency of its oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its resonance frequency or resonant frequency) than it does at other frequencies.
Description
A swing set is a simple example of a resonant system that most people have practical experience with. It is a form of pendulum.
If the system is excited (pushed) with a period between pushes equal to
the inverse of the pendulum's natural frequency, the swing will swing
higher and higher, but if excited it at a different frequency, it will
be difficult to move. The resonance frequency of a pendulum, the only
frequency at which it will vibrate, is given approximately, for small
displacements, by the equation[1]:

where g is the acceleration due to gravity (about 9.8 m/s2 near the surface of Earth), and L is the length from the pivot point to the center of mass. (An elliptic integral yields a description for any displacement.) Note that, in this approximation, the frequency does not depend on mass.
Mechanical resonators work by transferring energy repeatedly from kinetic to potential form and back again. In the pendulum, for example, all the energy is stored as gravitational
energy (a form of potential energy) when the bob is instantaneously
motionless at the top of its swing. This energy is proportional to both
the mass of the bob and its height above the lowest point. As the bob
descends and picks up speed, its potential energy is gradually
converted to kinetic energy (energy of movement), which is proportional
to the bob's mass and to the square of its speed. When the bob is at
the bottom of its travel, it has maximum kinetic energy and minimum
potential energy. The same process then happens in reverse as the bob
climbs towards the top of its swing.
Some resonant objects have more than one resonance frequency,
particularly at harmonics (multiples) of the strongest resonance. It
will vibrate easily at those frequencies, and less so at other
frequencies. It will "pick out" its resonance frequency from a complex
excitation, such as an impulse or a wideband noise excitation. In
effect, it is filtering out all frequencies other than its resonance.
In the example above, the swing cannot easily be excited by harmonic
frequencies, but can be excited by subharmonics.
Examples
Various examples of mechanical resonance include:
Resonance may cause violent swaying motions in improperly constructed structures, such as bridges and buildings. Both the Old Tacoma Narrows Bridge (nicknamed Galloping Gertie) and the London Millennium Footbridge (nicknamed the Wobbly Bridge) exhibited this problem. A faulty bridge can even be destroyed by its resonance (see "Angers Bridge"; that is why soldiers are trained not to march in lockstep across a bridge, although it is suspected to be a myth, see eg., MythBusters (season 2). Mechanical systems store potential energy in different forms. For example, a spring/mass system stores energy as tension in the spring, which is ultimately stored as the energy of bonds between atoms.
Applications
Various method of inducing mechanical resonance in a medium exist.
Mechanical waves can be generated in a medium by subjecting an
electromechanical element to an alternating electric field having a
frequency which induces mechanical resonance and is below any
electrical resonance frequency.[2]
Such devices can apply mechanical energy from an external source to an
element to mechanically stress the element or apply mechanical energy
produced by the element to an external load.
The United States Patent Office classifies devices that tests mechanical resonance under subclass 579, resonance, frequency, or amplitude study, of Class 73, Measuring and testing. This subclass is itself indented under subclass 570, Vibration.[3] Such devices test an article or mechanism
by subjecting it to a vibratory force for determining qualities,
characteristics, or conditions thereof, or sensing, studying or making
analysis of the vibrations otherwise generated in or existing in the
article or mechanism. Devices include methods to cause vibrations at a
natural mechanical resonance and measure the frequency and/or amplitude the resonance made. Various devices study the amplitude response over a frequency range is made. This includes nodal points, wave lengths, and standing wave characteristics measured under predetermined vibration conditions.
Earthquake machine
Nikola Tesla established a laboratory on Houston Street in New York at 46 E. There, at one point while experimenting with mechanical oscillators,
he allegedly generated a resonance of several buildings causing
complaints to the police. As the speed grew he hit the resonance
frequency of his own building and belatedly realizing the danger he was
forced to apply a sledge hammer to terminate the experiment, just as
the astonished police arrived.[4] The Discovery Channel's popular MythBusters show debunked Tesla's claim that he had created an "Earthquake Machine" in their 60th episode. They tested the physical phenomenon known as mechanical resonance on a traffic bridge,
which today are built to withstand such forces. While a single I-beam
of steel was deflected several feet in each direction by their
oscillator, and they reportedly felt the bridge shaking many yards
away, there were no "earth shattering" effects. It is worth indicating
that, in the time of the event undertaken by Tesla, buildings were not
built to withstand such resonance.
See also
- Devices
- Resonators, Reed switches, Transducers
- Non-mechanical
- Resonance, Electrical resonance, Laser applications
- Other
- Vibrations, Nikola Tesla, Tacoma Narrows Bridge
External links and references
- Citations
- ^ Mechanical resonance
- ^ Allensworth, et al., United States Patent 4,524,295. June 18, 1985
- ^ USPTO, Class 73, Measuring and testing
- ^ O'Neill, "Prodigal Genius" pp162-164
- Publications
- S Spinner, WE Tefft, A method for determining mechanical resonance frequencies and for calculating elastic moduli from these frequencies. American Society for testing and materials.
- CC Jones, A mechanical resonance apparatus for undergraduate laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 1995.
- Patents
- U.S. Patent 1,414,077 Method and apparatus for inspecting materials
- U.S. Patent 1,517,911 Apparatus for testing textiles
- U.S. Patent 1,598,141 Apparatus for testing textiles and like materials
- U.S. Patent 1,930,267 Testing and adjusting device
- U.S. Patent 1,990,085 Method and apparatus for testing materials
- U.S. Patent 2,352,880 Article testing machine
- U.S. Patent 2,539,954 Apparatus for determining the behavior of suspended cables
- U.S. Patent 2,729,972 Mechanical resonance detection systems
- U.S. Patent 2,918,589 Vibrating-blade relays with electro-mechanical resonance
- U.S. Patent 2,948,861 Quantum mechanical resonance devices
- U.S. Patent 3,044,290 Mechanical resonance indicator
- U.S. Patent 3,141,100 Piezoelectric resonance device
- U.S. Patent 3,990,039 Tuned ground motion detector utilizing principles of mechanical resonance
- U.S. Patent 4,524,295 Apparatus and method for generating mechanical waves
- U.S. Patent 4,958,113 Method of controlling mechanical resonance hand
- U.S. Patent 7,027,897 Apparatus and method for suppressing mechanical resonance in a mass transit vehicle
- Websites
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Resonance Frequency"
|