Water Quality K-12 Experiments
Water Quality
To most people not professionally involved in water quality issues, water is either drinkable (technically potable) or contains potentially harmful or toxic
substances. However, the vast majority of surface water on the planet
is neither potable nor toxic. This remains true even if we eliminate
from consideration the more than 97% of the earth's water found in the
oceans (sea water)—too salty to drink. Another general perception of water quality is that of a simple property that tells whether water is polluted or not. In fact, water quality is a very complex subject, in part because water is a complex medium intrinsically tied to the ecology of the entire planet.
Interest by individuals and volunteer groups in making local water
quality observations is high, and an understanding of the basic chemistry
of many water quality parameters is an essential first step to making
good measurements. Most citizens harbor great concern over the purity
of their drinking water, but there is far more to water quality than water treatment for human consumption. In point of fact, purification of drinking water
is really a different, although obviously related, subject altogether.
Many people in the world live where community water purification is
simply not a reality. For these people, water quality, even for
drinking purposes, relates directly to the local stream, lake, or groundwater.
Thus, at its heart, water quality is about preserving uses. Not only
use of water as a consumable product, but all other uses such as
wildlife habitat, irrigation, swimming, fishing, rafting,
and boating—any or all of which can be adversely impacted by water
quality degradation. Of course, industrial uses are also important, and
industries are always interested in the quality and quantity of water available to them.
Statements to the effect that "uses must be preserved" are included
within water quality regulations because they provide for broad
interpretation of water quality results, while preserving the ultimate
goal of the regulations. Technical measures of water quality—that is,
the values obtained when making water quality measurements—are always
subject to interpretation from multiple perspectives. Is it reasonable
to expect a river to be pristine in a landscape that no longer is? If a river has always carried sediment,
is it polluted even if the cause is not man induced? Can water quality
be maintained when water quantity can not? The questions that arise
from consideration of water quality relative to human uses of the water
become more complex when consideration must be given to conditions
required to sustain aquatic biota. Yet inherent in the concept of
preserving uses is a mandate that waterways must be much more than
conduits for a fluid we might want to drink, fill our swimming pool
with, or carry our wastes out of town.
Measurement of water quality
The complexity of water quality as a subject is reflected in the
many types of measurements of water quality. These measurements include
(from simple and basic to more complex):
The simple measurements (towards the top in the listing above) are
those that can be made with an instrument, in most cases in the field (in situ).
The more complex or difficult measurements are those that come from
analytical methods, typically requiring a water sample to be collected,
preserved, and later analyzed in a laboratory setting. These latter
measurements can be expensive and it is always important to understand
in advance the reason(s) for making any particular measurement. Also,
because the number of substances that could be present in a water
sample runs to the millions, it is not possible to reasonably establish
what all might be in a particular sample without a very large budget.
If the logic of this fact is difficult to grasp, the inefficiency
should be obvious: to satisfy such a request, a laboratory would have
to charge for determining the more that 99% of possibilities that are
NOT present in the sample to discover the minutely less than 1% that
are.
One effective way to improve water quality is to get more oxygen in
the water. AERATION is often done by sending compressed air to an air
diffuser at the bottom of the pond. The deep water rises to the surface
and the water molecules grab oxygen from the atmosphere. As the pond
water circulates, soon the oxygen levels in the water from top to
bottom increase. Thus, aeration adds oxygen to the water and improves
water quality.
See also
External link
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Water Quality"
|