Barrage Tidal Power
See also:
Categories of Tidal Power
Tidal power can be classified into two main types:
- Tidal stream systems make use of the kinetic energy
of moving water to power turbines, in a similar way to windmills that
use moving air. This method is gaining in popularity because of the
lower cost and lower ecological impact compared to barrages.
- Barrages make use of the potential energy in the difference in height (or head)
between high and low tides. Barrages suffer from very high civil
infrastructure costs, a worldwide shortage of viable sites, and
environmental issues.
Modern advances in turbine technology may eventually see large
amounts of power generated from the ocean, especially tidal currents
using the tidal stream designs. Tidal stream turbines may be arrayed in
high-velocity areas where natural tidal current flows are concentrated
such as the west and east coasts of Canada, the Strait of Gibraltar, the Bosporus, and numerous sites in south east Asia and Australia.
Such flows occur almost anywhere where there are entrances to bays and
rivers, or between land masses where water currents are concentrated.
Barrage tidal power
An artistic impression of a tidal barrage, including embankments, a ship lock and caissons housing a sluice and two turbines.
With only three operating plants globally Rance River, Bay of Fundy and Kislaya Guba the barrage method of extracting tidal energy involves building a barrage as in the case of the Rance River
in France. The barrage turbines generate as water flows in and out of
the estuary, bay, or river. These systems are similar to a hydro dam
that produces Static Head or pressure head
(a height of water pressure). When the water level outside of the basin
or lagoon changes relative to the water level inside, the turbines are
able to produce power. The largest such installation has been working on the Rance river, France,
since 1966 with an installed (peak) power of 240 MW, and an annual
production of 600 GWh (about 68 MW average power).
The basic elements of a barrage are caissons, embankments, sluices, turbines,
and ship locks. Sluices, turbines, and ship locks are housed in
caissons (very large concrete blocks). Embankments seal a basin where
it is not sealed by caissons.
The sluice gates applicable to tidal power are the flap gate, vertical rising gate, radial gate, and rising sector.
Barrage systems are affected by problems of high civil
infrastructure costs associated with what is in effect a dam being
placed across estuarine systems, and the environmental problems
associated with changing a large ecosystem.
Ebb generation
The basin is filled through the sluices until high tide. Then the
sluice gates are closed. (At this stage there may be "Pumping" to raise
the level further). The turbine gates are kept closed until the sea
level falls to create sufficient head across the barrage, and then are
opened so that the turbines generate until the head is again low. Then
the sluices are opened, turbines disconnected and the basin is filled
again. The cycle repeats itself. Ebb generation (also known as outflow
generation) takes its name because generation occurs as the tide ebbs.
Flood generation
The basin is filled through the turbines, which generate at tide
flood. This is generally much less efficient than ebb generation,
because the volume contained in the upper half of the basin (which is
where ebb generation operates) is greater than the volume of the lower
half (and making the difference in levels between the basin side and
the sea side of the barrage), (and therefore the available potential
energy) less than it would otherwise be. This is not a problem with the
"lagoon" model; the reason being that there is no current from a river
to slow the flooding current from the sea.
Pumping
Turbines are able to be powered in reverse by excess energy in the
grid to increase the water level in the basin at high tide (for ebb
generation). This energy is more than returned during generation,
because power output is strongly related to the head. If water is
raised 2 ft (61 cm) by pumping on a high tide of 10 ft
(3 m), this will have been raised by 12 ft (3.7 m) at
low tide. The cost of a 2 ft rise is returned by the benefits of a
12 ft rise.
Two-basin schemes
Another form of energy barrage configuration is that of the dual
basin type. With two basins, one is filled at high tide and the other
is emptied at low tide. Turbines are placed between the basins.
Two-basin schemes offer advantages over normal schemes in that
generation time can be adjusted with high flexibility and it is also
possible to generate almost continuously. In normal estuarine
situations, however, two-basin schemes are very expensive to construct
due to the cost of the extra length of barrage. There are some
favourable geographies, however, which are well suited to this type of
scheme.
Environmental impact
The placement of a barrage into an estuary has a considerable effect
on the water inside the basin and on the ecosystem. Many governments
have been reluctant in recent times to grant approval for tidal
barrages.
Turbidity
Turbidity (the amount of matter in suspension in the water)
decreases as a result of smaller volume of water being exchanged
between the basin and the sea. This lets light from the Sun to
penetrate the water further, improving conditions for the phytoplankton. The changes propagate up the food chain, causing a general change in the ecosystem.
Salinity
As a result of less water exchange with the sea, the average
salinity inside the basin decreases, also affecting the ecosystem.
"Tidal Lagoons" do not suffer from this problem.
Sediment movements
Estuaries often have high volume of sediments moving through them,
from the rivers to the sea. The introduction of a barrage into an
estuary may result in sediment accumulation within the barrage,
affecting the ecosystem and also the operation of the barrage.
Fish
Fish may move through sluices safely, but when these are closed,
fish will seek out turbines and attempt to swim through them. Also,
some fish will be unable to escape the water speed near a turbine and
will be sucked through. Even with the most fish-friendly turbine
design, fish mortality per pass is approximately 15% (from pressure drop, contact with blades, cavitation, etc.). Alternative passage technologies (fish ladders,
fish lifts, etc.) have so far failed to solve this problem for tidal
barrages, either offering extremely expensive solutions, or ones which
are used by a small fraction of fish only. Research in sonic guidance
of fish is ongoing.
The Open-Centre turbine reduces this problem allowing fish to pass
through the open centre of the turbine. Recently a run of the river
type turbine has been developed in France. This basically is a very
large slow rotating Kaplan type turbine mounted on an angle. Testing
for fish mortality has indicated much lower mortality figures, less
than 5%. This concept seems very suitable for adaption to marine
current/tidal turbines also VLH TURBINE
Energy calculations
The energy available from barrage is dependent on the volume of water. The potential energy contained in a volume of water is :
- E = Mgh
where:
h is the height of the tide
M is the mass of water = 1025 kg per cubic meter (seawater varies between 1021 and 1030 kg per cubic meter)
g is the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 meters per second squared at the Earth's surface.
Mathematical demonstration of a sample Tidal power generation
Assumptions:
- Let us assume that the height of tide at a particular place is 32 feet = 10 m (approx)
- The surface of the tidal energy harnessing plant is 9 sq km (3 km * 3 km)= 3000 m * 3000 m = 9 * 106 m2
- Specific gravity of Sea water = 1025.18 kg/m3
Mass of the water = volume of water * specific gravity
= (area * height) of water * specific gravity
= (9 * 106 m2 * 10 m) * 1025.18 kg/m3
= 92266 * 106 kg (approx)
Energy content of the water mass = Mass of water * g * height
= 92266 * 106 kg * 9.81 m/s2 * 10 m
= 9051 * 109 J (approx)
Now we have 2 high tides and 2 low tides every day.
Therefore the total energy generation potential per day = Energy for a single tide * 4
= 9051 * 109 J
= 36 * 1012 J
Therefore, the power generation potential = Energy generation potential / time in 1 day
= 36 * 1012 J / 86400 s
= 419 MW
Since we have assumed the power conversion efficiency to be 30%, The power generated = 419 MW * 30%
= 126 MW (approx)
A barrage is therefore best placed in a location with very high-amplitude tides. Suitable locations are found in Russia, USA, Canada, Australia, Korea, the UK. Amplitudes of up to 17 m (56 ft) occur for example in the Bay of Fundy, where tidal resonance amplifies the tidal range.
- Simple Approximation: P=hrk, where P is power in watts, h is height
in meters, r is rate in cubic meters per second, and k is
7,500 watts (assuming an efficiency factor of about 75 percent).
Economics
Tidal barrage power schemes have a high capital cost and a very low
running cost. As a result, a tidal power scheme may not produce returns
for many years, and investors may be reluctant to participate in such
projects.
Governments may be able to finance tidal barrage power, but many are
unwilling to do so also due to the lag time before investment return
and the high irreversible commitment. For example the energy policy of the United Kingdom
recognizes the role of tidal energy and expresses the need for local
councils to understand the broader national goals of renewable energy
in approving tidal projects. The UK government itself appreciates the
technical viability and siting options available, but has failed to
provide meaningful incentives to move these goals forward.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Tidal Power"
|